Unsubscribe

Confirm you would like to unsubscribe from this list

Remove strategy

Confirm you would like to remove this strategy from your list

Welcome to Thornburg

Please select your location and role to help personalize the site.
Please review our Terms & Conditions

TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF USE

Please read the information below. By accessing this web site of Thornburg Investment Management, Inc. ("Thornburg" or "we"), you acknowledge that you understand and accept the following terms and conditions of use.

Disclaimers

Products or services mentioned on this site are subject to legal and regulatory requirements in applicable jurisdictions and may not be licensed or available in all jurisdictions and there may be restrictions or limitations to whom this information may be made available. Unless otherwise indicated, no regulator or government authority has reviewed the information or the merits of the products and services referenced herein. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. Investments carry risks, including possible loss of principal.

Reference to a fund or security anywhere on this website is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold that or any other security. The information is not a complete analysis of every material fact concerning any market, industry, or investment, nor is it intended to predict the performance of any investment or market.

All opinions and estimates included on this website constitute judgements of Thornburg as at the date of this website and are subject to change without notice.

All information and contents of this website are furnished "as is." Data has been obtained from sources considered reliable, but Thornburg makes no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of such information and has no obligation to provide updates or changes. Thornburg disclaims, to the fullest extent of the law, any implied or express warranty of any kind, including without limitation the implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and non-infringement.

If you live in a state that does not allow disclaimers of implied warranties, our disclaimer may not apply to you.

Although Thornburg intends the information contained in this website to be accurate and reliable, errors sometimes occur. Thornburg does not warrant that the information to be free of errors, that the functions contained in the site will be uninterrupted, that defects will be corrected or that the site and servers are free from viruses or other harmful components. You agree that you are responsible for the means you use to access this website and understand that your hardware, software, the Internet, your Internet service provider, and other third parties involved in connecting you to our website may not perform as intended or desired. We also disclaim responsibility for damages third parties may cause to you through the use of this website, whether intentional or unintentional. For example, you understand that hackers could breach our security procedures, and that we will not be responsible for any related damages.

Thornburg Investment Management, Inc. is regulated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange under U.S. laws which may differ materially from laws in other jurisdictions.

Online Privacy and Cookie Policy

Please review our Online Privacy and Cookie Policy, which is hereby incorporated by reference as part of these terms and conditions.

Third Party Content

Certain website's content has been obtained from sources that Thornburg believes to be reliable as of the date presented but Thornburg cannot guarantee the accuracy, timeliness, completeness, or suitability for use of such content. The content does not take into account individual investor's circumstances, objectives or needs. The content is not intended as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sale of any security or other financial instrument or any investment management services, nor does it constitute investment advice and should not be used as the basis for any investment decision.

Suitability

No determination has been made regarding the suitability of any securities, financial instruments or strategies for any investor. The website's content is provided on the basis and subject to the explanations, caveats and warnings set out in this notice and elsewhere herein. The website's content does not purport to provide any legal, tax or accounting advice. Any discussion of risk management is intended to describe Thornburg's efforts to monitor and manage risk but does not imply low risk.

Limited License and Restrictions on Use

Except as otherwise stated in these terms of use or as expressly authorized by Thornburg in writing, you may not:

  • Modify, copy, distribute, transmit, post, display, perform, reproduce, publish, broadcast, license, create derivative works from, transfer, sell, or exploit any reports, data, information, content, software, RSS and podcast feeds, products, services, or other materials (collectively, "Materials") on, generated by or obtained from this website, whether through links or otherwise;
  • Redeliver any page, text, image or Materials on this website using "framing" or other technology;
  • Engage in any conduct that could damage, disable, or overburden (i) this website, (ii) any Materials or services provided through this website, or (iii) any systems, networks, servers, or accounts related to this website, including without limitation, using devices or software that provide repeated automated access to this website, other than those made generally available by Thornburg;
  • Probe, scan, or test the vulnerability of any Materials, services, systems, networks, servers, or accounts related to this website or attempt to gain unauthorized access to Materials, services, systems, networks, servers, or accounts connected or associated with this website through hacking, password or data mining, or any other means of circumventing any access-limiting, user authentication or security device of any Materials, services, systems, networks, servers, or accounts related to this website; or
  • Modify, copy, obscure, remove or display the Thornburg name, logo, trademarks, notices or images without Thornburg's express written permission. To obtain such permission, you may e-mail us at info@thornburg.com.

Severability, Governing Law

Failure by Thornburg to enforce any provision(s) of these terms and conditions shall not be construed as a waiver of any provision or right. This website is controlled and operated by Thornburg from its offices in Santa Fe, New Mexico. The laws of the State of New Mexico govern these terms and conditions. If you take legal action relating to these terms and conditions, you agree to file such action only in state or federal court in New Mexico and you consent and submit to the personal jurisdiction of those courts for the purposes of litigating any such action.

Termination

You acknowledge and agree that Thornburg may restrict, suspend or terminate these terms and conditions or your access to, and use, of the all or any part this website, including any links to third-party sites, at any time, with or without cause, including but not limited to any breach of these terms and conditions, in Thornburg's absolute discretion and without prior notice or liability.

Decline

Give Us a Call

Fund Operations
800.847.0200

FIND ANOTHER CONTACT
Emerging Markets

New Forces Driving the Emerging Markets Evolution

As the growth drivers shift and emerging countries become less vulnerable to macro sensitivities, individual companies will matter more than countries.

Summary:

  • Emerging markets have undergone a tremendous change and investors should rethink how they approach the asset class. Next generation growth drivers, such as rising domestic consumption, leapfrogging technologies, and expanding economic formalization not only play a crucial role in reshaping emerging market economies, but also in the available underlying investment opportunities and where to find them.
  • As the growth drivers shift and emerging countries become less vulnerable to macro sensitivities, top-down country approaches should provide less opportunity and will be challenged going forward. Through our research, there is already evidence that the returns between the best and worst performing countries have narrowed considerably over the past five years. Casting a wide net and focusing on top-down driven country allocations may not be as rewarding going forward.
  • In contrast, the dispersion between the best versus worst performing companies has not only increased, but where you find these successful companies has also changed. Strong performing companies are less concentrated in a particular region or country, and instead are scattered across a wide variety of countries and sectors. We believe managers who have a bottom-up, security selection approach are best suited to discriminate between productive and unproductive investments and can sufficiently deliver attractive excess returns to investors.

Over the past couple of decades, the transformation of emerging markets has been remarkable. Influenced by major geopolitical, economic, and demographic changes unique to each country, emerging markets as a whole are not homogenous, but instead encapsulate a broad range of countries, each with their own currencies, political systems, and financial policies. Given the high degree of economic diversity and range of developmental trajectories within each emerging country, many managers have approached this asset class with a top-down, country-level approach. The belief is that making successful country allocation decisions can be enough to overcome the deficiencies from the lack of strong securities selection.

At Thornburg, we believe emerging market opportunities are best assessed through a high conviction, fundamentally built portfolio that targets the strongest companies across the asset class, regardless of where they call home. As emerging countries continue to mature, we believe the case for a focused bottom-up investment approach is stronger than ever.

In this paper, we investigate key factors to consider when investing in this asset class.

  • What are the next-generation emerging market growth drivers?
  • How has the divergence of country-level performance changed and what are the implications for managers focusing on top-down alpha generation? 
  • Will a bottom-up, security selection focused approach be sufficient to deliver the excess returns investors are looking for? 

New forces reshaping the EM landscape

The picture for the emerging market landscape has changed dramatically in recent years. While commodities extraction and dependence on net exports were key factors driving emerging market growth historically, new forces are surfacing and reshaping the emerging market growth story. This is most evident from the stark shift in sector prominence within the MSCI Emerging Market Index between 2009 and 2021. As seen in Figure 1, materials and energy companies made up almost a third of the index in 2009, but have experienced a significant decline over the past decade. Meanwhile, over the same time period, the consumer discretionary and technology sectors have increased their prominence, doubling their combined weight from 19% to 39% in the MSCI Emerging Market Index.

Figure 1: Developing country economies are rapidly modernizing

Source: MSCI Barra and FactSet

There are several forces coming together that are driving this tectonic change. First, over the past decade more than a billion people in developing countries have entered the middle class, and hundreds of millions more will join their ranks over the coming years. Overall healthier demographics and rising income levels of the growing middle class have created durable, persistent demand for goods and services that will further support the “new economy” growth model led by domestic consumption.

Spurred by these shifts, a rapid expansion of innovation is allowing emerging market economies to leapfrog outdated technologies, often to the leading-edge, bypassing many of the intermediary steps of technological development. As one example, a global proliferation of smart phones has enabled mobile banking solutions, easing the need for branch banking and significantly reducing customer acquisition costs. The resulting “FinTech revolution” is enabling increased financial inclusion for a previously unbanked class of emerging consumers. Whether in FinTech, or other areas like transportation, manufacturing, healthcare and clean energy, technological leapfrogging is substantially improving the quality of bottom-up investment opportunities across emerging markets.

While the landscape is improving, a rising tide has not lifted all boats. As an example, we also see a growing bifurcation of the investment universe, where there is still a prevalence of “old economy” companies (e.g., state-owned banks, utilities, commodities and cheap manufacturers) mixing in with these innovative leaders striving to meet the new economy needs. Thus, it is increasingly important for managers to take a more nuanced approach in order to select companies that can benefit from these “next generation of growth drivers”.

As growth drivers shift, top-down country calls may provide less opportunity

The shift from “old economy” towards the “next generation growth drivers” is well underway. We believe that the increase in domestic consumption, coupled with the leapfrogging of legacy technologies, are driving factors that have led emerging countries to become more economically diversified and more stable than before. As a result, emerging countries are less tied to macro factors like global trade and fixed asset investment, which have historically driven emerging market volatility and contributed to large dispersions of returns among countries. As a result, emerging markets are less volatile today than in the past, and the spread of country-level performance across individual emerging markets has decreased dramatically.

As illustrated in Figure 2 we looked at the annual performance of each country in both the developed and emerging market regions, organized the country performance by quartiles, and calculated the spread between the top quartile versus the bottom quartile performers. We found that since 2003, the performance spread between the best and worst performing countries in the MSCI Emerging Market Index has narrowed considerably. In the early 2000s, the average annual return spread between the best and worst performing countries was 77%, making top-down country allocation decisions a seemingly compelling endeavor with big payoffs. However, over the last five years, the performance edge obtained by allocating towards the expected best performing countries versus the worst has eroded significantly to only 43%. As a comparison, we also investigated the country-level performance for developed markets and have found that the return spread between the best versus worst developed countries has remained more relatively stable.

Figure 2: Looking only at countries, top versus bottom-quartile EM return spread is eroding

FactSet

Small segment of EM companies has disproportionately driven returns

Based on the country-level performance trends we’re seeing; investors may be tempted to conclude the transformative shifts in the emerging market space have improved market efficiencies to the point that it is much harder to generate alpha. This is not the case. In our view, we believe the most attractive alpha opportunities are best uncovered on a company-by-company basis versus on a regional or country level. The transitional nature of emerging markets has meant that there is more opportunity for truly elite companies to provide excess returns for investors. Emerging market equity managers need to take extra care in differentiating between the “old economy” laggards versus the “new economy” growth opportunities, which only active investment managers are capable of.

The evidence is clear, the divergence between the company-level winners and losers in the emerging market space has grown substantially over the past decade, both in absolute terms and relative to developed markets. In Figure 3, we begin our exercise by analyzing the contribution to returns of all the holdings in both the MSCI Emerging Market Index, as well as the MSCI World Index. We organize the holdings into quartiles based on the most contributive to the least contributive to total index returns. The best performing emerging market companies in the first-quartile group have contributed to 221% of the index returns over the last decade, while the worst performing bottom-quartile companies have detracted from the index by 114%. Within developed markets, the deviation between the top and bottom performers has been much more modest.

Figure 3: Getting stock selection right is critical in emerging markets

Source: FactSet

Taking a deeper dive and comparing the top-quartile performers in both the MSCI Emerging Market Index and MSCI World Index, we see in Figure 4 that the average return premium for the top quartile performers in emerging markets has been greater than in the developed region. More specifically, over the past five years, from 2016 to 2020, the return differential between emerging vs. developing markets top performers has widened to 14% in favor of emerging companies, compared to only 8% from 2011 to 2015. We also see similar trends when observing how the bottom-quartile companies performed in both regions. As seen in Figure 5, bottom-quartile companies in the emerging market space underperformed more than the bottom-quartile companies in developed markets.

Figure 4: Return differential of emerging vs. developed best performers

Source: Bloomberg

The performance data quoted represents past performance; it does not guarantee future results.

Figure 5: Return differentials of emerging vs. developed worst performers

Source: FactSet

The performance data quoted represents past performance; it does not guarantee future results.

It is worthwhile to re-emphasize that the spreads between the best and worst companies have persistently been widening, while the spread at the country-level performance has been narrowing. This underscores the importance of getting stock selection right in the emerging markets space, and we believe that deep research on company fundamentals should serve as the bedrock of investment decisions, especially in this space. Furthermore, we suspect it will be much more difficult for a top-down manager to discriminate between the individual winners versus losers, because these best performing names have been scattered across a broad range of countries and sectors.  As an example, the top 100 best performing emerging market companies over the past decade were found across 14 different emerging countries and all 11 GICS sectors. A strong, bottom-up fundamental process will be best positioned to uncover the prime opportunities.

Conclusion:

In summary, there is abundant evidence that multiple forces are reshaping the emerging market landscape. These include next-generation growth drivers, such as rising income levels of the middle class, leapfrog technologies, and increased economic formalization, which will give birth to additional investment opportunities in this space.  Furthermore, given the level of transformation we expect to transpire in this asset class, we believe emerging country-level performance patterns will also be greatly affected.   Emerging country returns are becoming susceptible to macro-level sensitivities and there will be less volatility and dispersion of returns among countries. Based on our research, this trend has already played out over the past few years where the spreads between the best and worst companies have persistently been widening, while the performance spread among countries has been narrowing. We feel this trend will continue to challenge top-down macro and passive managers, reinforcing the need to focus on selecting the best companies, which is best executed through a fundamentally driven, bottom-up approach.

Discover more about:

Stay Connected

Subscribe now to stay up-to-date with Thornburg’s news and insights.
Subscribe

More Insights

The Fed’s Third Mandate: A Tool to Determine When Policy Pivots?

Co-Head of Investments Jeff Klingelhofer argues that the Fed's third mandate may help signal the timing of the next policy shift.

Public vs. Private Credit: How We Assess Both Opportunities

Portfolio Manager Ali Hassan walks us through the potential opportunities and pitfalls of private and public credit, along with what investors should consider.
Global Equity

Beneficiaries of Europe’s REPower Plan

As the European Union rethinks its energy supplies, we believe the shift away from Russian gas may create significant growth opportunities for investors.
Global Equity

Emerging Markets Confront Political Hurdles in the Near Term

Portfolio Manager Josh Rubin discusses significant political events in emerging markets that may impact investors.
International Growth

Blockchain on the Brink of an Investment Revolution

Portfolio Manager and Managing Director Sean Sun explains the paradigm shift around blockchain technology and the opportunities it presents for investors.

‘Pick-your-poison’: Wall Street sell-off resumes

Thornburg Portfolio Manager Sean Sun tells Reuters that increasing geopolitical issues leave investors few places to hang their hats.

Our insights. Your inbox.

Sign up to receive timely market commentary and perspectives from our financial experts delivered to your inbox weekly.
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Feedback